Sources and factual descriptions
Game format, publisher identity and supported platforms should be checked against official product pages, developer material or store listings. A source is linked where it supports a profile. Unresolved details are identified rather than filled in from assumptions about the genre.
Source-based profiles and hands-on reviews
A published feature list can support a description of mechanics. It cannot establish whether controls feel responsive, an interface is clear or a game runs reliably. A hands-on review requires a record of the version, device, test conditions and observations. The current profiles do not claim that testing.
Ratings and recommendations
The catalogue does not assign numerical ratings without a documented assessment. Thematic selections explain why games are compared; they are not a claim that one title is universally better. Reader testimonials are not published without a verifiable submission.
Commercial disclosure
A product link is provided as a source or a route to official information. Any paid placement, sponsorship or affiliate relationship must be clearly disclosed on the relevant page. Editorial descriptions must remain supported by evidence.
Corrections and updates
Reports should identify the affected page, disputed statement and supporting source. Substantive factual changes should carry a correction note. A source-check date records when documentation was consulted; it is not a guarantee that a game remains unchanged.